Thoughts on beauty

11 Oct

I get an impression that beauty is an addon in urban structures and in craftsmanship A paint job. But that is in contrast to how nature creates beauty. Beauty in natures case is an organic emergent phenomenon inherent in the design and development thereof itself not an addon like paint or picture hung on a wall. Although certain people did not quite take this sentiment quite the right way thereby creating urban structures that are ugly, sterile or just plain depressing as summed up in the philosophy of utilitarianism.

But the sentiment itself is quite apt. Beauty should be a natural emergent phenomenon and looking to nature for inspiration in this department would help take us to the next level in aesthetics in terms of making it an inherent emergent property just like water when it emerges from a fountainhead rather than something that is a paintjob that is likewise derived from function other than aesthetics which in a particular example from nature leaves that are green in order to properly utilize sunlight to create starch.

Or for a human example. A woman lips that are naturally red with a face that is symmetrical absent any modification that is also likewise highly sexually dimorphic which is a result of physical and genetic health naturally resulting in such a beauty.

Such examples indicates beauty that emerges organically as a result of substance as well as design. And demonstrates the intimate connection of beauty with truth and truth with beauty. For if beauty is not true and is merely superficial then beauty is a sham.

An illusion of something that does not truly exist except as a mirage, a false indicator of substance that is in truth non-existent.

Yet such biological examples indicate beauty does exist as a result of and is an honest indicator of that which is good and useful. And is not a sham.

Beauty that shields a lack of substance like the white-washed tomb of the pharisees full of dead bones and rot in contrast to the inside that is cleaned leading to cleanness of the outside cannot be considered truly as beauty in my opinion. It can only be termed “bullshit”





4 Responses to “Thoughts on beauty”

  1. Mark Citadel October 30, 2015 at 6:40 pm #

    Many commit the error of confining beauty to subjectivity, but this is to exclude and disavow a theological beauty which is evident in that which is godly, and its imprint on all creation, though sometimes twisted by human hands.

    • infowarrior1 October 30, 2015 at 11:42 pm #

      That’s true.. Its also true that confining beauty to subjectivity also allows for the abominations of ugliness we see in the modern art and architecture scene in housing and apartment complexes built in the brutalist style or ugly glass and metal shapes that many skyscrapers are built like.

    • infowarrior1 November 1, 2015 at 11:30 am #

      What exactly is beauty in your opinion? What is it about the nature of God that such is a naturally emergent phenomenon of his?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: